Interactive Oral Presentation

Caption: Old cartoons were not as violent as nowadays's cartoons.

 

What have I learnt in class: There are a higher levels of physical agression in childrens programmes ,also that the children usually tended to copy the negative behaviour they see on the television.

 Supportive information for internet(1): 

(...)"assessing the mode of violent acts portrayed in Looney Tunes slapstick cartoons, the researchers found that in 1930s ,out of 317 violent acts ,312 or 98.42%  portrayed physical violence and five or 1.58% portrayed psychological violence. Next, in 1940s 500 or 93.11% out of 537 violent acts were physical violence,nine or 1.67% were verbal  violence,ten or 1.86%    were lethal violence and 18 or 3.55% were psychological violence."(...)

http://amic.org.sg/conference/AMIC2013/Full%20Papers/A4/RACIDON%20P.%20BERNARTE%20et.%20al.pdf

Supportive information for internet(2):

(...)" Kids who watch cartoons like  "Scooby Doo" are more likely to experience sleep disturbance than kids who watch "Curious George."(...)

(...)" Why the difference? Per the researchers, the difference relates to the amount of violence in the one set of shows versus the other. Old Scooby is actually quite violent, Curious George not so much. In “Bugs Bunny,” the characters are always slapping each other around. In “Dora the Explorer,” barely ever".(...)

 http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/when-the-media-is-the-parent/201306/cartoon-violence-and-children-s-sleep

Opinion: I think that old cartoons have the same violent level as nowadays(both have violent contents).

Important Ideas:

1)The principal reason that affects children be violent are the television programmes.

2)The violence in old cartoons is the same that the new cartoons, but in the new cartoons is more easy identify the violence than the old cartoons.

3)The most famous cartoon shows are violent or are a bad influence (The Simpsons , Looney Toones , Dragon Ball, etc).